🔗 Share this article

As the existentially challenged Conservative party meets in Manchester for its annual party conference, it has plenty to consider regarding its path forward. It’s not even clear if a clear direction is available. These are difficult days for a governing group that now has very little, if anything, new or unique to say to the electorate.

The Missed Opportunity

It could have been vastly better if tangible progress had been made on an agenda that matters to people across the country: Equal opportunity. However the previous administration did not possess the slightest idea on how to transform the trendy talk on levelling up into concrete action. Over twenty-four months after the 2019 election, it argued over what the concept even meant.

It seemed strange to me, because I’d already told Johnson what social mobility entailed when we originally talked about it during the contest for party leader. This terminology was a term I developed and used at the education ministry to talk about life chances. It served as our guiding principle, and its meaning is unambiguous: social mobility is the method by which we attain equal access – not by taking opportunity away from those who are already advantaged, but rather by expanding opportunities to those that lack them.

Essential Principle

Another crucial education department term we used, “potential is equally shared throughout the nation, but opportunity is not”, served as a deliberate expression, embodying the dual components of a equal opportunity plan. To begin with, ability distributed uniformly but not nurtured uniformly through our schools and colleges. Second, chances not distributed fairly by businesses or our economic system. Thus, learning and employment were crucial to achieving stronger social mobility. This was an mission about the social fabric of our country – supporting human talent and linking them with prospects.

The Actual Outcome

How did levelling up become under Johnson’s Conservatives? Regional development money managed by the the relevant ministry. Decorative floral displays and rearranged intersections. An official policy document was released almost thirty-six months after the leadership change, which saw current strategies rebadged under the fresh social mobility slogan.

As a result, a wider fairness strategy went undeveloped, as well as all the change that it may have generated – in funding, business, fiscal strategy, tax and in community development. And, of course, in learning, including a tertiary education that has become a scapegoat for elected officials – even though it remains the most powerful engine of upward movement for individuals from less privileged homes, like me, this country has had in recent decades. Perhaps the only engine of equal opportunity, working extensively.

The Importance of Aspiration

Aspiration is essential for our country to prosper. For hope to exist, there needs to be a believable feeling that dedication and outcome are related; that if people dream big, they can attain. For all administrations, being able to instil a sense of optimism about the future is critical. Studies by the academic institution at the academic establishment and others, recently released, showed that the ministry’s focus zones I introduced as education secretary – community-focused methods to enhancing learning results – led to young people in those areas being up to 18 percentage points more hopeful about their future than those in equivalent locations without these initiatives in place. The research confirms: just making an sincere effort on equal chance initiatives can rapidly and effectively change how people view their destiny.

Lost Potential

Oblivious to this, and in the throes of its new leader election, in that period, the Tory administration terminated the programmes. Why would anyone in those communities vote for a organization that took that action? The opportunity areas policy is a clear case of what had the potential to be a revolutionary Conservative government agenda on levelling up, but that chance was hopelessly squandered. Methods such as this can generate optimism and ambition. Conversely, as the ruling party discovered, reneging on commitments of equal opportunity is the biggest blunder any leadership can make. The electorate punished the leadership for its incompetence but, above all, for its unfulfilled commitments on levelling up.

Today’s Political Reality

Now the responsibility on life chances and fair access has been taken up by a opposition party. The old slogan has been discarded. The new government has its own policy language of “removing obstacles to success”. The party that is steadily supplanting the hapless incumbents, the alternative party, also has its own language – “economic renewal”. The terminology to talk about new opportunities in regions like the one I grew up in, in my hometown. It suggests that an historical manufacturing base can reincarnate into an modern manufacturing sector.

To the electorate, it must appear as a repetitive cycle. Similar challenge, different language. Yet, currently, little improvement.

The Way Forward

Whether the government and opposition want to avoid the same fate, both these parties should understand the Tories’ mistakes on levelling up; that social mobility rhetoric is simple terminology, but effective implementation of more equal results is much harder. Britain’s persistently low social mobility remains the central problem for our country, with the next generation unable to get a good job beginning, those laboring in employment with minimal progress after the rent has been paid, and people across the country without any genuine belief their children will be able to do improve in life than they have.

Elected officials can mention equal chances repeatedly. However, which party has the organization that has the comprehensive policy agenda on social mobility? None appear to exist. The first to achieve this, succeeds. Not just for themselves, but, significantly, for a whole country that has urgently needs equal access so badly.